General Christopher Musa’s Epiphany: From Negotiation to the “Iron Wall” Strategy
By Erasmus Ikhide
For years, the Nigerian security discourse has been a pendulum swinging between the soft touch of “appeasement” and the hard edge of “annihilation.”
As the Minister of Defence, General Christopher Gwabin Musa, takes the mantle, we are witnessing a profound and necessary ideological pivot. The man who once, in his capacity as Chief of Defence Staff, navigated the murky waters of potential negotiation with “repentant” terrorists, has now emerged with a clear, uncompromising mandate: No more deals with the devil.
The Death of Appeasement
General Musa’s recent “stern warning” to those who humanize terrorists —specifically calling out the dangerous rhetoric that a “friend of a thief is a thief” — marks the end of an era of hesitation. This reversed position is not just a change in tone; it is an admission that the Nigerian state can no longer afford to outsource its sovereignty to bandits through “peace deals” that only serve to buy the enemy time to re-arm.
The General’s new zero-tolerance policy against ransom payments and local government negotiations is a direct echo of the counsel many of us have provided from the trenches of journalism. We have long argued that you cannot negotiate with an arsonist while he still holds the match. By insisting that “kinetic efforts” must be backed by a total refusal to legitimize armed groups, Musa is finally aligning the military’s muscle with a coherent political will.
The “Trumpian” Border: A Wall for Survival*
Perhaps the most significant victory for sound security advocacy is General Musa’s recent embrace of the “Border Fence” philosophy. In a series of recent statements, the Minister has moved past the archaic notion that our 4,000-kilometer border is “un-policable.” Instead, he has looked toward the modern precedents set in the Western Hemisphere—specifically the high-security, technologically integrated borders constructed by the Trump administration.
General Musa’s call to “fence our borders” represents a revolutionary shift in the Nigerian military mindset. For too long, “porous borders” was used as an excuse for failure; today, under Musa’s leadership, it is being treated as a problem with a structural solution.
”Maybe we cannot have physical walls everywhere, but there is technology we can deploy systematically.
Once someone crosses, an alarm is triggered and we take action.” — Gen. Christopher Musa, 2026.
This acceptance of the “Border Wall” concept—integrating physical barriers with Al-driven surveillance—is the “solidly constructed” vision I have championed in my earlier writings. It is the only way to stop the “Fire from the Sahel” from continually bleeding into the Nigerian heartland.
The Legal and Moral Case for Zero-Tolerance
The distinction between an indigenous citizen and a foreign intruder is the bedrock of any sovereign nation’s security. When individuals cross Nigeria’s borders illegally to perpetrate violence —regardless of whether they share ethnic ties with local populations, such as the Fulani or other trans-border groups — they forfeit any claim to the protections afforded by civil negotiation.
Under international law and Nigeria’s own Internal Security Acts, these individuals are not “aggrieved citizens” but hostile foreign combatants. Treating them as anything less than an invading force undermines the very definition of a nation-state. By applying a uniform, “iron-fisted” response to all foreign intruders, General Musa is signaling that ethnic affinity is no longer a valid shield for criminal activity.
Preserving National Integrity Over Trans-Border Ties
Furthermore, the historical fluidity of the Sahelian borders has long been exploited by extremist groups to facilitate the movement of arms and personnel. Statistics from various security agencies suggest that a significant percentage of the “banditry” in the Northwest and North-Central regions is fueled by non-Nigerian elements who take advantage of the porous Nnamdi Azikiwe-era border concepts. By categorizing these foreign actors — be they of Saharan, Sahelian, or West African origin —strictly as illegal insurgents, the Nigerian state detaches the security crisis from internal ethnic politics.
The Road Ahead: From Rhetoric to Concrete
While the reversal of the negotiation policy and the commitment to border fencing are commendable, the ultimate test remains in the execution. The N77.4 trillion allocated to the defense sector must now manifest not in the offshore accounts of “transactional” generals, but in the steel, concrete, and fiber-optics of a secure frontier.
General Musa has the “clear conscience” he spoke of when leaving the CDS role. Now, as Minister, he must have the “Iron Will” to ensure that the military is no longer “conquered” by the very bandits it is paid to destroy. By building the wall and breaking the negotiation table, he is finally speaking the only language that terrorists understand: the language of absolute state dominance.
Erasmus ikhide contributed this article via: ikhideluckyerasmus@gmail.com
Dear Readers, Good and credible news reportage is tedious task and requires huge finances.
We are soliciting your Noble support for as low as N1,000 your support would go a long way in assisting us to continue to guarantee our readers quality news.
Bank transfers can be made to:
Account Name: Harvest and Commercial
Bank: Sterling Bank
Account Number: 0078627735