Supreme Court Review: Ihedioha’s Lawyers Introduces New Facts That No One Has Heard on the Case

Mr. Agabi has introduced an issue that is not in the public domain that the Appellants (Uzodinma and APC) appealed the decision of the Court of Appeal dismissing their petition but did not argue that ground before the SC and therefore are deemed to have abandoned it.

The consequence he has argued is that the CA decision dismissing the petition still subsists which rendered the SC appeal incompetent.
He is now arguing the point that the number of votes cast in the PUs introduced by Uzodinma exceeded the number of verified voters in those PUs.

This is going to be interesting but I do not see the Justices of the Supreme Court departing from its decision in the Bayelsa case that they cannot review/revisit their Judgment.

Spread the love

Facebook Comments